Financhill
Buy
65

SYM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$32.89
Seasonality move :
-24.02%
Day range:
$33.50 - $37.80
52-week range:
$16.32 - $41.76
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
1.73x
P/B ratio:
18.05x
Volume:
4.5M
Avg. volume:
1.8M
1-year change:
-0.03%
Market cap:
$3.7B
Revenue:
$1.8B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.07

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
SYM
Symbotic
$522.4M $0.05 13.63% -- $32.26
CHMX
Next-ChemX
-- -- -- -- --
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
-- -- -- -- --
LXFR
Luxfer Holdings PLC
$86.7M $0.17 -1.51% 70% $17.00
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings
$425.5M $0.84 -3.81% -17.94% --
QIND
Quality Industrial
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
SYM
Symbotic
$34.00 $32.26 $3.7B -- $0.00 0% 1.73x
CHMX
Next-ChemX
$5.30 -- $151.3M -- $0.00 0% --
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
$11.53 -- $11.1M -- $0.03 1.65% 0.42x
LXFR
Luxfer Holdings PLC
$11.31 $17.00 $302.7M 14.50x $0.13 5.75% 0.77x
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings
$17.12 -- $243.6M 7.48x $0.13 2.92% 0.14x
QIND
Quality Industrial
$0.01 -- $1.5M -- $0.00 0% 0.02x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
SYM
Symbotic
-- 2.159 -- 0.85x
CHMX
Next-ChemX
-- -0.361 -- --
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
-- 0.716 -- 2.34x
LXFR
Luxfer Holdings PLC
16.87% 0.814 14.49% 0.72x
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings
65.04% 1.398 207.54% 0.92x
QIND
Quality Industrial
-- 1.909 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
SYM
Symbotic
$107.8M -$32.1M -2.31% -2.31% -5.83% $249M
CHMX
Next-ChemX
-- -$414.8K -- -- -- -$206.9K
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
$1.7M $70.2K -19.72% -19.72% 0.97% -$2.1M
LXFR
Luxfer Holdings PLC
$21.4M $7.7M 7.57% 9.74% 8.45% $4.2M
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings
$68.1M $19.9M 3.1% 9.33% 5.11% -$19.5M
QIND
Quality Industrial
-- -- -- -- -- --

Symbotic vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns SYM or CHMX?

    Next-ChemX has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Symbotic's net margin of --. Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31% beat Next-ChemX's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SYM
    Symbotic
    19.62% -$0.04 $421.6M
    CHMX
    Next-ChemX
    -- -$0.02 --
  • What do Analysts Say About SYM or CHMX?

    Symbotic has a consensus price target of $32.26, signalling downside risk potential of -4.88%. On the other hand Next-ChemX has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Next-ChemX, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Next-ChemX.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SYM
    Symbotic
    8 8 1
    CHMX
    Next-ChemX
    0 0 0
  • Is SYM or CHMX More Risky?

    Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Next-ChemX has a beta of -0.100, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.992%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SYM or CHMX?

    Symbotic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Next-ChemX offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Symbotic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Next-ChemX pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SYM or CHMX?

    Symbotic quarterly revenues are $549.7M, which are larger than Next-ChemX quarterly revenues of --. Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M is lower than Next-ChemX's net income of -$465.9K. Notably, Symbotic's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Next-ChemX's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic is 1.73x versus -- for Next-ChemX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SYM
    Symbotic
    1.73x -- $549.7M -$3.9M
    CHMX
    Next-ChemX
    -- -- -- -$465.9K
  • Which has Higher Returns SYM or CVR?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Symbotic's net margin of 5.54%. Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SYM
    Symbotic
    19.62% -$0.04 $421.6M
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    22.88% $0.42 $20.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About SYM or CVR?

    Symbotic has a consensus price target of $32.26, signalling downside risk potential of -4.88%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SYM
    Symbotic
    8 8 1
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0 0 0
  • Is SYM or CVR More Risky?

    Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.127, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.265%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SYM or CVR?

    Symbotic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Symbotic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SYM or CVR?

    Symbotic quarterly revenues are $549.7M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Symbotic's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic is 1.73x versus 0.42x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SYM
    Symbotic
    1.73x -- $549.7M -$3.9M
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0.42x -- $7.2M $401K
  • Which has Higher Returns SYM or LXFR?

    Luxfer Holdings PLC has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Symbotic's net margin of 5.67%. Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31% beat Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 9.74%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SYM
    Symbotic
    19.62% -$0.04 $421.6M
    LXFR
    Luxfer Holdings PLC
    22.06% $0.20 $272.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About SYM or LXFR?

    Symbotic has a consensus price target of $32.26, signalling downside risk potential of -4.88%. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.31%. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Symbotic, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Symbotic.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SYM
    Symbotic
    8 8 1
    LXFR
    Luxfer Holdings PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is SYM or LXFR More Risky?

    Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.479%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SYM or LXFR?

    Symbotic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luxfer Holdings PLC offers a yield of 5.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Symbotic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays out 76.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SYM or LXFR?

    Symbotic quarterly revenues are $549.7M, which are larger than Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $97M. Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M is lower than Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Symbotic's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luxfer Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 14.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic is 1.73x versus 0.77x for Luxfer Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SYM
    Symbotic
    1.73x -- $549.7M -$3.9M
    LXFR
    Luxfer Holdings PLC
    0.77x 14.50x $97M $5.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns SYM or PKOH?

    Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Symbotic's net margin of 2.05%. Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SYM
    Symbotic
    19.62% -$0.04 $421.6M
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings
    16.8% $0.60 $1B
  • What do Analysts Say About SYM or PKOH?

    Symbotic has a consensus price target of $32.26, signalling downside risk potential of -4.88%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -9.46%. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings has more downside risk than Symbotic, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SYM
    Symbotic
    8 8 1
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings
    0 1 0
  • Is SYM or PKOH More Risky?

    Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.653%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SYM or PKOH?

    Symbotic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Symbotic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SYM or PKOH?

    Symbotic quarterly revenues are $549.7M, which are larger than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $405.4M. Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M. Notably, Symbotic's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 7.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic is 1.73x versus 0.14x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SYM
    Symbotic
    1.73x -- $549.7M -$3.9M
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings
    0.14x 7.48x $405.4M $8.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns SYM or QIND?

    Quality Industrial has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Symbotic's net margin of --. Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31% beat Quality Industrial's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SYM
    Symbotic
    19.62% -$0.04 $421.6M
    QIND
    Quality Industrial
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About SYM or QIND?

    Symbotic has a consensus price target of $32.26, signalling downside risk potential of -4.88%. On the other hand Quality Industrial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SYM
    Symbotic
    8 8 1
    QIND
    Quality Industrial
    0 0 0
  • Is SYM or QIND More Risky?

    Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial has a beta of -4.545, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 554.533%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SYM or QIND?

    Symbotic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quality Industrial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Symbotic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SYM or QIND?

    Symbotic quarterly revenues are $549.7M, which are larger than Quality Industrial quarterly revenues of --. Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M is higher than Quality Industrial's net income of --. Notably, Symbotic's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quality Industrial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic is 1.73x versus 0.02x for Quality Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SYM
    Symbotic
    1.73x -- $549.7M -$3.9M
    QIND
    Quality Industrial
    0.02x -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will RocketLab Stock Be In 5 Years?
Where Will RocketLab Stock Be In 5 Years?

Rocket Lab (NASDAQ: RKLB) closed recently at around $30 per share,…

Is MO dividend Worth It?
Is MO dividend Worth It?

Altria Group (NYSE: MO) is paying investors $1.02 a share…

How High Will Take-Two Stock Go?
How High Will Take-Two Stock Go?

Take-Two Interactive (NASDAQ:TTWO) is the video game development company behind…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
83
GMS alert for Jun 23

GMS [GMS] is up 0.03% over the past day.

Buy
54
SMLR alert for Jun 23

Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 16.13% over the past day.

Buy
57
GXO alert for Jun 23

GXO Logistics [GXO] is up 2.42% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock